Monday, April 13, 2020

IELTS Essay Writing Samples - Which Ones To Use?

IELTS Essay Writing Samples - Which Ones To Use?All the information on the Internet is there, from students that you can enroll with them to those who are experts in IELTS exam writing samples. But you have to decide which ones you want to use. After all, they are professionals, so they should know what they are doing.Here is a small list of those, that are recommended by experts in the subject. Most of them are linked to their websites, where you can find them through the links. The only one that is not mentioned here is the easiest IELTS essay writing sample.The following people are quite popular in their fields and have good advice for writing an essay. Here are their tips and opinions. However, you need to be wary of any service that promises to help you in the matter of writing an essay. You will be given a list of samples, and the offer of a free consultation, if you can wait for a while.The first person who comes to mind is Bernard Cohen, who has the best advice for IELTS exam writing samples. He has been an examiner for over 20 years, and is an expert on the subject. He has done hundreds of IELTS essays and has great insight on how to write it correctly.If you are interested in his wonderful ideas, he will do everything in his power to help you pass your test. You may even request him to write an essay for you. If he agrees, he will spend a considerable amount of time researching and studying the topic and then write it for you.You may also try asking article writers who are good at writing on that topic. Some of them are part of the IELTS Association. If you can afford this, then you can consult them. As long as they are professional writers, you can feel at ease.All the online writers in this category are experts in the field. They do not charge any fee for writing an essay for you. If you really want to pass your exam, you need this resource.

Saturday, April 11, 2020

Government Spending & Budget Essays (2773 words) - Fiscal Policy

Government Spending & Budget Government Spending & Budget As many Federal departments and agencies lurch into an era of running without funds, the leaders of both parties of Congress are spending less and less time searching for a compromise to balance the budget, and more and more time deciding how to use it to their advantage on the campaign trail. Meanwhile money is easily borrowed to pay for government overhead. In an attempt to change this, on June 29, Congress voted in favor of HConRes67 that called for a 7 year plan to balance the Federal Budget by the year 2002 (Hager 1899). This would be done by incorporating $894 billion in spending cuts by 2002, with a projected 7 year tax cut of $245 billion. If this plan were implemented, in the year 2002, the U.S. Government would have the first balanced budget since 1969. There is doubt by citizens that a balanced budget will become reality. A recent Gallop Poll from January, 1996 showed the budget as the #1 concern among taxpayers, but 4/5 of those interviewed said they doubt the GOP will do the job (Holding 14). Meanwhile, an ABC poll from November reported that over 70% of those polled disapprove of the current performance by Congress, and most blamed politicians for failure to take action (Cloud 3709). These accusations of failure to follow through come with historical proof that Congress and Clinton have failed to compromise and resolve the issue. After all, current budget plans are dependent on somewhat unrealistic predictions of avoiding such catastrophes as recession, national disasters, etc., and include minor loopholes. History has shown that every budget agreement that has failed was too lax. One might remember the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings bill that attempted to balance the budget, but left too many exemptions, and was finally abandoned in 1990 (Weinberger 33). So after a pain-staking trial for GOP Republicans to create, promote, and pass their budget, as promised on campaign trail 94, Clinton rejected the very bill he demanded. This essentially brought the federal budget back to square one. Clinton thought such a demand on Republicans to produce a budget would produce inner-party quarrels and cause the GOP to implode. Instead, they produced a fiscal budget that passed both houses of Congress, only to be stalemated by a stubborn Democratic President Clinton. Meanwhile, Clinton bounced back with a CBO scored plan with lighter, less risky cuts to politically sensitive areas like entitlements. Clinton's plan also saved dollars for education and did not include a tax increase, but most cuts would not take effect until he is out of office, in the year 2001. Although Clinton is sometimes criticized for producing a stalemate in budget talks, the White House points out that the debt has gone down since Clinton took office, with unemployment also falling. Republicans are quick to state that Clinton originally increased taxes in 1993 and cut defense programs, but his overall plan was for an increasing budget without deficit reduction. Startling Facts about the budget: As of 1996, the national debt was at an all time high of $5 trillion dollars, with interest running at a whopping $250 billion per year (Rau M-1). This equals out to an individual responsibility of more than $50,000 per taxpayer. Nearly 90% of that debt has accumulated since 1970, and between 1980 and 1995, the debt grew by 500%. Currently, the debt grows by more than $10,000 per second (Rau M-l), and at current rates, a baby born in 1992 will pay 71% of his or her income in net taxes. At current rates, our government is about to reach its breaking point. If that's not enough to scare a taxpayer, by 2002, 60% of government spending will be for entitlements, and by 2012, these programs are projected to take up all government revenue (Dentzer 32). Not only economic development, but also family income is hurt by debt. With the cost of living going up, it becomes harder to find a job. According to the Concord Coalition, real wages peaked in 1973 and have gone down ever since. If the economy grew as fast as it did in 1950, without a debt, the median family income would be $50,000, compared to the present median